Estás en Inicio > When companies take advantage of administrative silence

Artículo

When companies take advantage of administrative silence

9 de septiembre de 2022

2 minutos de lectura

Companies, such as individuals, are slaves of their words and sometimes they face a huge problem if their ambitious targets are not met. Putting these missed goals in a drawer, as if no journalist would ask about them afterwards, is a risk that should be avoided if they want to keep their reputation unscathed. So it’s worth thinking twice before setting any guidelines.

In the Spanish legal sphere, the ‘administrative silence’ concept is defined as “a way of abnormal conclusion of the administrative procedure that operates when, upon expiration of the term to resolve a claim, request or petition and and no decision or resolution has been issued, the omission, delay or negligence in the pronouncement is supplemented by a legal effect that the law gives to such silence.”

This formula can have a positive or negative meaning, but in many cases, it implies a tacit refusal of a petition or appeal by the citizen due to the mere expiration of the deadline that the Public Administration has to issue its verdict.

Companies sometimes prefer to remain silent as part of their communication strategy. It normally happens in negative circumstances. For example, when environmental objectives have failed to be met.

In such cases, it is noticeable how forecasts tend to be forgotten and companies silently abandon these goals or modify their scope, similar to children hiding leftovers under the carpet in order to avoid being scolded.

However, journalists have an elephant’s memory and tend to return to the subject, especially if it is controversial and generates interest. The problem is when this leads to a serious reputational crisis. In this case, and if the silence persists, it will be taken to be an escape mechanism that proves the guilt of the company, thus leaving its image damaged. In the end, this strategy is, for all practical purposes, the acceptance of a failure which irreparably harms credibility, with the bad consequences that this may have on the business and its stock performance, in the case of listed companies. There are millions of euros at stake, which may disappear from the market capitalization at a stroke of a pen, together with the trust its customers place in the brand.

By Carlos López Perea, senior consultant at Estudio de Comunicación.

@clopezperea

Descarga gratuita

Guía de Comunicación Financiera para Directivos

Manual práctico con los 12 principios de la comunicación financiera estratégica.

AVISO EDC: Está descarga es fija para todos los artículos.
Decidir el criterio.

¡Genial! Hemos recibido tu información.

Más artículos

30 de octubre de 2026

Estudio de Comunicación comparte su experiencia en asuntos públicos con alumnos de la Universidad Nebrija

María Delgado, gerente de Relaciones Institucionales de la consultora, impartió una sesión sobre la gestión de proyectos, la...

28 de octubre de 2026

Spain Investors Day: Adriana Maldonado analiza el futuro de la industria española

“Hay que modernizar sectores tradicionales como la automoción o la agroindustria y potenciar otros como el farmacéutico, un...

26 de octubre de 2026

Auge y Batacazo de Katie Zacharia

Si hay algo que me aterra, quizás aún más, que la facilidad con la que los estadounidenses acceden...

7 de octubre de 2026

Celebrada la IV edición de los Premios Liderazgo Sanitario a los médicos, hospitales y proyectos de organismos públicos más destacados de España

También se han entregado los Premios a la Excelencia Sanitaria, al Compromiso Social, a la Divulgación en Salud...